Friday, October 22, 2010 - 8:28 AM

The former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, retired Gen. Hugh Shelton, says in his just-published memoir, Without Hesitation: The Odyssey of an American Warrior, that President Bill Clinton’s White House lost the "presidential authorization codes" for launching a nuclear strike, and they were missing "for months." Shelton writes, "This is a big deal—a gargantuan deal -- and we dodged a silver bullet.”
Shelton says the system "failed" and asks "how in the hell could we have lost the codes and not known it?"
It sounds quite alarming, but there's a big gap here. Shelton’s account is oddly imprecise about a process that is supposed to work like clockwork.
According to Shelton, a Pentagon checker routinely went to the White House once a month to see what Shelton calls the "nuclear authorization codes." Shelton describes these codes as absolutely essential to the launching of nuclear weapons. He writes:
Without those, it doesn't matter if we’ve got a thousand missiles verified inbound to the United States, we would be unable to launch a retaliatory strike. If our survival depended on launching a preemptive strike, without the President's having those authorization codes, such a strike would be impossible. That's how crucial it is to maintain the integrity of those nuclear-authorization codes -- which are to remain within very close proximity to the President at all times."
Shelton goes on to say that when the Pentagon checker went to the White House to verify the codes, he was supposed to lay his eyes on them, and make sure all was in order. Every four months, the checker would rotate the codes.
On one visit, the checker was told he could not see the codes; a White House aide claimed that Clinton had them personally, but was in a meeting and could not be interrupted. Shelton says the checker accepted that answer, and went away. Then, the next month, a different checker went to the White House, and got the same line: the president was busy, the codes are fine, but he can't be disturbed. Again, the checker just went away. According to Shelton, this "comedy of errors" went on without Clinton's knowledge until it came time to rotate the codes, when "we learned that the aide had no idea where the old ones were, because they had been missing for months." This was sometime in 2000, Clinton's last year. The codes were replaced, swiftly.
If Shelton is to be believed, then, due to some White House error, Clinton didn't have the essential codes for command and control of the nuclear weapons for months, and, even though these codes are absolutely critical to the security of the nation and the world, he lost them and didn't even know that he had lost them, because it was an aide who lost them. Oh, the Pentagon didn’t know either.
It doesn't add up.
The president does not possess the actual codes to authorize the launch of nuclear weapons. What the president does carry (or an aide) is a small laminated card which is used to authenticate the president's identity in the event of an emergency. The cards contain date-time groups and alphanumeric codes in columns and rows, according to Bruce Blair, president of the World Security Institute who has written several books on nuclear command and control. In an emergency, a president would use this laminated card to verify that he is the commander in chief making decisions.
Is this the "code" that the Pentagon checker was looking for, and was somehow lost? Well, if Clinton misplaced one, or an aide did, then it would not have been difficult to replace -- immediately, not months later. The Defense Department was the custodian of the system.
Were things so confused in the Clinton White House that an aide could lose the authenticator card for months, keep the military in the dark, and keep the president in the dark too?
No question, if the card was lost for months, that's reason for worry. A nuclear alert would involve intense decision-making stress, and potential chaos; this is one glitch that no one would want to see in a system that must be fail-safe. That's why I find it hard to believe that the card went missing for months.
If the president could not authenticate in an emergency, then the military commanders would speed dial to the vice president, and down the list of successors, according to Blair. But in a sudden alert, this process is guaranteed to get confused.
In addition to the laminated card, the president is also accompanied by a military aide carrying the "football," the briefcase which contains war plans and decision guides for a president in the event of an alert. The football is carried everywhere a president goes. It is a symbol, and a potent one, of the nuclear age. Shelton knows about the football, and describes it earlier in his book. Is this what he means by the lost codes? The device is a critical link in our system of command and control, is handled by a military aide, and if it were missing, I am certain it would have been noticed -- immediately, not months later.
So, what was actually lost? Shelton may have a story to tell here, but so far, it does not hold together.
There is one lesson to be taken away from this, relevant today. Both Russia and the United States still keep nuclear-armed missiles poised on launch-ready alert. The land-based U.S. missiles can be launched within four minutes of an order from the president. Keeping missiles on such high alert may have provided an extra edge for deterrence in a time of intense superpower confrontation, but it is not needed today, nearly two decades after the end of the Cold War. Both countries should find a way to de-alert those land-based missiles, building in some kind of pause, say hours or days before the missiles could be launched, giving a president some extra time to avoid a mistake, such as a launch based on a false alarm. In a crisis, finding the president's authenticator card ought to be the least of his concerns.
THE ARTICLE HAS BEEN CONFIRMED IN THE BOOK DERELICTION OF DUTY
Dereliction of Duty
An Eyewitness Account of How Bill Clinton Compromised America's National Security.
Hardcover: 256 pages
Dimensions (in inches): 0.89 x 9.26 x 6.40
Author: Buzz Patterson
Publisher: Regnery Publishing; (March 1, 2003)
Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Robert "Buzz" Patterson was a military aide to President Clinton from May 1996 to May 1998 and one of five individuals entrusted with carrying the "nuclear football"—the bag containing the codes for launching nuclear weapons. This responsibility meant that he spent a considerable amount of time next to the president, giving him a unique perspective on the Clinton administration. Though he arrived at the job "filled with professional devotion and commitment to serve," he left believing that Clinton had "sown a whirlwind of destruction upon the integrity of our government, endangered our national security, and done enormous harm to the American military in which I served."
Dereliction of Duty is not a personal attack on President Clinton or a commentary on his various scandals; rather, it is a "frank indictment of his obvious—to an eyewitness—failure to lead our country with responsibility and honor." Lt. Col. Patterson offers a damning list of anecdotes and charges against the President, including how Clinton lost the nuclear codes and shrugged it off; how he stalled and lost the opportunity to launch a direct strike on Osama bin Laden at a confirmed location; how the President and the First Lady, and much of their staff, consistently treated members of the military with disrespect and disdain; and how Clinton groped a female Air Force enlisted member while aboard Air Force One, among other incidents large and small. A considerable portion of this slim book is devoted to the myriad ways in which President Clinton undermined the military, and hence the security, of the nation. He seriously questions Clinton's decisions to send troops to Somalia, Rwanda, Haiti, and Bosnia to accomplish non-military tasks without clear objectives. Having participated in each of these engagements, Lt. Col. Patterson personally "experienced the frustration of needlessly wasted lives, effort, and national prestige" as well as the alarmingly low morale that Clinton inspired.
This is certainly not the first anti-Clinton book, but it is different in that Patterson does not seem to have a political ax to grind. In fact, at times, he appears apologetic about having to write about his ex-commander in chief. Yet, in the end, this retired soldier felt his last act of service should be to share his experience with his country.
And of course a book with a title like that (released in 2003) certainly inspires confidence that it carries no bias. Additionally we can be sure that the fact that the author seems only interested in writing books on how the left and/or Obama are destroying the military is irrelevant to how he might present facts about Democratic presidents.
Bush 41 deployed US troops to Somalia, not Clinton.
He did it to ensure some U.S. servicemen would get killed on Clinton's watch due to the new team's inexperience.
That promptly happened.
G.H.W. Bush is a horrible person, with vipers for sons.
Walt
Clinton did deploy troops to somalia
walt spewed: "Bush 41 deployed US troops to Somalia, not Clinton."
Of course Clinton deployed troops! The original humanitarian mission under Bush was complted months earlier and the Marines withdrawn. Clinton sent in Rangers after Aidid killed a bunch of Pakistani peacekeepers. If you're gonna spew, at least get a clue about the basic facts.
"He did it to ensure some U.S. servicemen would get killed on Clinton's watch due to the new team's inexperience.
That promptly happened.
G.H.W. Bush is a horrible person, with vipers for sons."
Pure ignorant bs from a moron
The idea that George H. W. Bush would send in soldiers simply to make his successor look bad (which would also ruin the image of the U.S) isn't exactly plausible. Unlike his son, H. W Bush was a fairly experienced leader and wasn't too bad in office.
Do not complicate a life. I do not believe in it. And yet, thanks for the info.
I regard Hoffman's - and the other poster's - dismissal of Shelton's written statement, especially in view of Patterson's independent and INSIDE the White House view, disturbing and superficial.
Of COURSE someone would have 'missed' the suitcase sized football. But knowing with what disdain ALL the White House Staff ALL Military Aides to President Clinton had, I can fully believe that something key - such as the code-card - was lost. (Let me recall the name of the General Officer who was told by Clinton's staff that 'they' didn't want military men coming into the White House in UNIFORM)
Clinton was so cavalier about 'national security' that it was he and his staff who totally blew the significance of the African Embassy Bombings, the attack on the Cole, and missed the opportunity to strike or grab Osama Bin Laden.
Perhaps FP will produce a book on the singular topic "Clinton and National Security' and enlighten us how well he carried out his responsibilities.
the military checker "went away"?!
this part is most damning. really? couldn't WAIT around for POTUS to finish meeting? if anyone was derelict it was the people who are supposed to make system work.
According to the U.S. "Washington Times"
Shelton was born in 1942, Tarboro, North Carolina has been involved in the command of the Gulf War in 1990 the work of the United States in 1997 as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, retired after last year's term.
According to the U.S. "Washington Times" 7 disclosure, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, a four-star Army General Henry XieErDu June 1998 visit to Russia, the bodyguard had cleverly foiled plot to assassinate the Russian mafia . But the U.S. military community there is some doubt that this is security overreaction behavior, may be A&F planning to take credit rewards the scene of "farce."
David E. Hoffman is a Pulitzer Prize-winning author and a contributing editor to Foreign Policy.
Read More
(9)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE