Friday, September 24, 2010 - 4:41 PM

If a missile came hurtling at the United States or Canada, an early-warning system is ready to detect it as early as possible. A missile could threaten a whole city. But what if a virus threatened the same city, perhaps carried by migratory bird, or an airplane passenger?
The virus might have a better chance of arriving undetected. Look no further than last year’s swine flu pandemic for an example of how a novel pathogen spread rapidly around the world. The virus was a unique combination of genes which had apparently mixed in pigs somewhere in Mexico.
When a dangerous new virus strikes, the public health system reacts with vaccines or therapeutic drugs. But these measures usually begin only after people start to get sick, and can take months or years to create.
What if there was a way to predict how a virus is going to evolve? What if technology could help peer into the future and see the next steps in mutation? What if there was a missile warning system for incoming viral threats?
Impossible? Perhaps. But in the next few years, pay attention to the something called Prophecy.
The Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency has just published broad plans for an ambitious, three-year effort which seeks to "achieve the ability to successfully predict the natural evolution of any virus." The project, called Prophecy, hopes to leverage existing knowledge about viral genomes -- the genetic code -- to figure out which direction viruses are evolving. Some viruses like influenza are relatively simple in their genetic structure, but they evolve at hyper-speed, leading to new strains that can evade detection or are resistant to existing drug therapies. Prophecy will attempt to spot the direction of change before it happens. Such a warning could pay huge dividends in preparing for, or even avoiding, a pandemic.
The Prophecy program seeks “to transform today’s vaccine and drug development enterprise from observational and reactive to predictive and preemptive.”
One goal of Prophecy is to develop a “platform” that can accurately reproduce and analyze the genetic events in a virus -- how it evolves in response to certain pressures. Another goal is to develop an algorithm capable of predicting these genetic events. It is a tall order, but today’s technology can crunch through the genetic code of a virus relatively quickly. The changes in a genome may be explored by examining shifts or trends in a large cache of data. Computers can sift and analyze mountains of that data. The results might point to the way a virus is mutating, and, if caught early enough, lead to a response that would save lives.
Such futuristic goals are the trademark of DARPA, which was established by President Eisenhower after the Soviet Union launched the Sputnik satellite on Oct. 4, 1957. The agency undertakes high-risk research aimed at cutting-edge solutions to problems. While its primary mission is for the military, the results have sometimes tumbled into civilian life. For example, its early research gave rise to what we know today as the Internet.
Joe Raedle/GETTY IMAGES
Funny that you should mention H1N1, the biggest non-event since whatever the last one was.
Before I went to work at the CDC I also thought Pandemics were fast moving and difficult to defend against. What I found out was surprising, at first.
A Pandemic would take 2-5 years in the US to spread. Other countries differ for all sorts of reasons.
Fast killing viruses are the easiest to contain, the alarm is sounded quickly and victims do not have a chance to travel. Quarantines do not take a committee to administer and the situation fixes itself as the 'fuel' burns out quickly.
Slow killing viruses spread farther, but communication travels at the speed of light. Slow killing viruses also target groups of a species rather than entire species in general. The Public is made aware of the threat and is more ready to avoid contact with suspicious people and we've become more educated on how to protect and combat contagions. Purel, N95 masks, and a little OCD is 95% of the battle, communication is the 1st 5%.
H1N1 was a gross exaggeration and an example of what happens when you 'stimulate' a Federal Agency. We got the standard, Swine Flu case detected, wash your hands, etc, etc. Someone died, the news got hold of it, then Congress got hold of it. Congress appropriated money to CDC and what else could they do except spend it. 36,000 people die each year in the US from some sort of Flu, they all have fancy H#N# names.
DARPA is a worthwhile venture, but spending millions on a system that will predict how an outbreak might evolve that Purel, a N95 mask, and some OCD can prevent is a bit much.
Perhaps we should be spending our resources on addressing existing pandemics vs. trying to predict new ones. TB has been around for ever, and we've known how to treat it for over 50 years. One-third of the people on the planet are carriers. Yet because of a lack of recent investment in diagnostics and treatment we've spawned drug-resistant strains that are difficult and expensive to treat, and in some cases, impossible to treat. It's great to look into the future, but we should finish the work that already there to be done when diseases like TB kill 1.7 million people each year.
On this surface this sounds like a great idea. Being able to predict the evolution of a virus like Influenza could save millions of lives. However, to me this just sounds like an undercover DoD biological weapons program.
While I applaud DARPAs initiative in dealing with the next “pandemic”, I agree with the comments made above. Americans have been overexposed by the media, and often over react to the next “end of the world”. The effort spent on fighting future pandemics that may never be could be better spent fighting the plights of humanity that are already here.
David E. Hoffman is a Pulitzer Prize-winning author and a contributing editor to Foreign Policy.
Read More
(4)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE